LE TEMPS DES « SANS CULOTTES »

Le sympathique et rougeoyant Boris Johnson, maire de Londres, a vu dans les sphères dirigeantes françaises le retour des « sans culottes ». Et, une fois n’est pas coutume, le commentateur anglais n’a pas tort ! Simplement il s’est trompé de «sans culottes». Ceux auxquels il faisait allusion étaient ceux de la révolution française, qui conquirent l’Europe. Or rien de conquérant dans nos « sans culottes » d’aujourd’hui. Et ce n’est que par l’habitude prise de baisser le pantalon que nos gouvernants se retrouvent « sans culottes ». C’était vrai de Sarkozy aussi, mais d’autres avant lui, dont un certain général confronté au FLN.
La 5ème république est bien, comme la 1ère, celle des « sans culottes », à cette différence près que les seconds donnaient la « déculottée » quand les premiers se satisfont de la recevoir.

Les premiers actes de début de quinquennat m’ont fait espérer. Six mois après j’ai le sentiment que le nouveau président n’a rien appris ni rien oublié de son prédécesseur. A quoi bon en changer alors ? Et le sympathique « ministre du redressement    productif »    risque    fort    de    finir    « ministre    improductif    du redressement ». C’est ce que j’écrivais il y a un mois ( lire « le rapport Gallois et le concert des grenouilles »), bien avant l’épisode Mittal.

Force est de constater, après cet épisode, que le « ministère improductif du redressement » est conforté. Pas du fait de son ministre qui n’en peut mais, mais de sa hiérarchie, les Hollande, Ayrault et autres Moscovici. Ils avaient, dans cette affaire, une chance inespérée de manifester, à bon compte, le retour de l’Etat sur le devant de la scène. Mais non, d’un simple rendez-vous avec le président de la République, le sieur Mittal a mis tout ce beau monde dans sa poche, comme au bon vieux temps de Sarkozy. Quelques promesses qui n’ont « engagé que ceux qui les ont reçues », comme aurait dit Charles Pasqua.

Il nous faut donc faire la liste des cocus. Elle risque d’être longue : 

-    Montebourg, qui aurait du démissionner pour marquer ses distances, 

-    Les ouvriers du groupe Mittal, qui voient confirmé que leur direction est
souveraine en France, 

-    Leurs syndicats, 

-    L’industrie lourde française qui transfert sa technologie au tiers monde
pour mieux se suicider, 

-    Les Français qui finiront tous... 

- Le Pouvoir qui, à force de reculer, expose dangereusement nos
arrières... ! 

En attendant l’improbable Bonaparte.

THE COLONIZED PEOPLE COMPLEX (England versus France)

It does work likewise, with individuals and peoples. Infancy trauma memory is engraved in indelible manner in the unconscious. And there are two laws on which everyone should meditate: 

1°) this unconscious memory is proportional to trauma intensity,
2°) intellectual development (individual or collective) is conversely proportional to this memory impact on behaviour. The weaker the intellectual development the stronger this unconscious memory would affect the behaviour. The result is an inferiority complex which, often, may activate an aggressive attitude (see Islam fundamentalists).

If individual memory doesn’t last more than a simple life, peoples memory survived thanks to experience and innate passed on, from generation to generation, for a surprising long time (thousand years). So all peoples who, once, have been dominated (and this did happen, one day or another, to alls) will keep this domination complex in memory. All the more acute since this domination has been traumatic.
The immemorial Polish hate for Russian or German peoples is a testimony. Conversely there is no resentment from Gallic peoples (the ones who became French) versus Roman peoples (actually Italians) because this colonization has been soft and advantageous to the colonized peoples.

I often question myself about the outburst of popular English news paper against France and French peoples for any pretext. Last was the pictures of Kate MIDDLETON (princess of Cambridge) naked nipple taken in France by French “paparazzi” few days ago.
No question about the right for private life (better protected in France than in England) but, as we use to say in French, “there was no matter to lash a cat”, even less to call for a judge. And out of France this would have remain a no consequence matter. But France and French peoples being involved the expected English reactivity has been exploited by English papers right away. Why ?

We alls (French and British peoples) have tendency to forget that England has been, a long time ago, a former French colony for, at least, two centuries following the duke of Normandy conquest (1066). His successors “Plantagenêts” (a typical French family name) sharing their time between France and England.

As a consequence of the conquest the Saxon peoples were brutally deprived of their lands to the benefit of the invaders who, in addition, imposed their French language and their French laws. See the popular Robin hood myth, the brave Saxon who resist to brutal king John (Plantagenêt), unworthy brother of Richard heart of lion, who... never set foot in England !

And today the only ones to be proud of their French origins are the oldest families of the English nobility who’s name are still French and who are looking, with a bit of condescension, to those recent incoming “Hanover’s”, cousins of Saxons, both origins from poorly civilised Germany, to be set, by chance, on the English throne.

And if the Windsor’s (their brand new name) are so popular in England it’s, mainly, because they have no links with France and the ancient masters of England. Moreover their blood being gradually mixed up with commoner Anglo-Saxon blood (see Kate Middleton) to be melt into the ancestral Saxon community, now in command.

This has been the main reason for perpetual wars lasting between the two countries, the revenge to humiliation. But after a five hundred years war we have now, already, a two hundred years peace, not enough to get rid of past. And weapons have been replaced by insults, which has to be considered some sort of improvement.