ATOMICS CLOCK. A KEY TO GRAVITY UNDERSTANDING ?

 
WILEY: pf ticket 11532677

CERN; inc 283878

ATOMICS CLOCK. A KEY TO GRAVITY UNDERSTANDING ?

In our previous article, dated 04.24.2013, we highlight how relativity of time theory could be easily challenged with a simple experiment. We indicate, too, that atomic clock working was, probably, cause of general misleading when they looks to confirm the theory. Here is how ?

 

Let’s first remember the Chéseau-Halley law about stars luminosity: "

which is decreasing by the square of the distance from the source". This law has to be compared to 4th Newton one about gravity force which state that gravity is "… conversely proportional to the square of distance".

As we now know, light is made of photons particle, then we may assert that their quantity should increase when approaching the luminosity source and decrease when moving away. Such source being, obviously, a baryonic mass we may also assert that this increase of photons population has to be according to 4th Newton law when approaching mass gravity center, which is too the one of the light source. Therefore we have to deduct that

there must be some links between photons particle and gravity! The more gravity is the more photons population has to be.

Now, thanks to Albert Einstein, we know too that there is equivalency between gravity and acceleration. If so the variation of photons population must be related to the variation of acceleration.

 

We know that photons are member of the boson family. Likewise all bosons, photons have tendency to gather together in the same state, some sort of a mutual stimulus. This is the basic condition for laser working. Within such photons medium any excited atom will get less excited by giving out an additional photon coming to the same state that majority photons.

 

 

As the atomic clock characteristic is to be able to register transition energy level for such or such atoms, one may now consider that the atom great stability (ex: cesium) is set within a stable photons population. But no longer if photon population came to be modify.

Variation of such photons population would, therefore, affect the frequency stability of the atomic clock. And in fact atomic clock may be used to detect tectonic plate motion which cause local gravity change and then photons population variation.

 

We fill strongly here lie the explanation for the little gap registered between two identical clocks, one at rest the other in motion, rather than the relativity of time theory for which, in addition, we will found no clear definition of time in the theory (see "Relativity dead

end").

 

But those atomic clock experiences were not in vain because they are an open gate to gravity force understanding. This understanding will be our next and final issue.

To come: " FROM NO RELATIVITY OF TIME TO GRAVITY ?"

GBA
05.05.2013

Email : correspondance@editiondelomnibus.com

www.editiondelomnibus.com

WAS EINSTEIN WRONG ABOUT RELATIVITY OF TIME ?

WAS EINSTEIN WRONG ABOUT RELATIVITY OF TIME ?

 

Let’s consider one of the main conclusion to which Einstein came with his famous 1905 article about special relativity:

 

"

… from which we have to deduct the following peculiar consequence. If considering two marks A and B of K on which are set two synchronized clocks at rest and if we move the clock located in A at a V speed along the straight joining A from B then, when this clock is up to reach the B clock, those two clocks are no longer synchronized: the one having moved from A to B is delayed of ½ t (v/C²) sec. compared to the B clock at rest…"

 

Let’s consider this in a practical manner. First of all we have to be rid of the idea of "clocks at rest" for in the Universe nothing is at "rest" (see "Relativity dead end").

The best we could do would be to locate two clocks in two spots along the equatorial line. They will be "at rest" one to the other, but submitted (among others) to the same Earth motion (about 1 000 miles per hour rotation speed to the East). Let’s now suppose the first one (A) being located in Singapore (Sumatra island) and the second (B) at Quito (Equator). They are half Earth circumference away each other.

 

And now the A clock will be set in an airplane to get to Quito where stand the B clock, at the speed of 1 000 miles per hour. Two courses are possible, to the East or to the West. It should make no difference because distances are identical and the airplane speed too. But according to an extraterrestrial point of view there is one main difference: cumulative speed. If the airplane flight is heading East, the speed should be the addition of Earth plus airplane speed, 1 000 m/h + 1 000 m/h = 2 000 m/h. If the flight is heading West its speed should be subtracted from Earth speed: 1 000 m/h – 1 000 m/h = 0.

 

According to Einstein equation, ½ t (v/C²) s, the gap between the two clocks should result different because "v" is different. And, in fact, such experience has been made in 1971 with atomic clocks flying East and West, and the result came to be 59st billions part of a second delay when clock was flying toward East and 273st billions part of a second ahead when flying toward West. This is verify too with our moderns satellites. Hurray! Special relativity was right. Not so sure…!

 

Let’s figure now another experience which has not yet been set. The A clock being still located in Singapore, meanwhile the B clock would be relocated at North Pole. If the speed at the equatorial line is still 1 000 m/h, the one at North Pole is… 0 m/h. The A clock, located in Singapore, should come with a slight delay to compare with the B clock located at North Pole, with no need to move any clock toward the other. I bet that a slim delay from the A clock would appear. Should that means the impossibility to get clocks synchronized on Earth? Obviously not and to verify it we should try an additional experience.

 

A geo-stationary satellite located at equal distance from Singapore and North Pole, some part above China and Mongolia border, is able to produce a flash light every ten seconds, some kind of a lighthouse. This may be considered as a perfect clock. If time is slightly delayed in Singapore to compare with North Pole time, the flash light reception should be slightly delayed too. But how this could happen when we have to consider that

1°) emission is common, 2°) distance is identical, 3°) flash light speed C, is equal ?

 

Let me bet, again, that flash light is gone be received at the exactly same moment at each spot! In this case it looks like relativity of time does not work anymore. How come?

 

The answer lie in the atomic clock working and we will see, in our next article, how a misleading relativity of time theory will bring about an understanding of gravity force.

NEXT: IS GENERAL RELATIVITY WRONG TOO ?


GBA
23.04.2013

Email : correspondance@editiondelomnibus.com


www.editiondelomnibus.com