WILEY: pf ticket 11532677
CERN; inc 283878
GRAVITY! A TWO THOUSAND YEARS WAY TO SOLUTION
In our two previous articles (04.23 and 05.05. 2013) we did point out that :
- 1°) atomic clock proof for relativity of time could be easily challenged by a simple experiment,
- 2°) there was another, more reliable, explanation for such registered atomic clock variation,
- 3°) the explanation seems to be linked to variations of local photons population
- 4°) and, finally that said variations obey to same law (Chéseau-Halley) that fourth Newton gravity one. For which we have to conclude there must be some links between photons and gravity.
We know too, thanks to Einstein, that acceleration generate an identical phenomenon as gravity does. But a more appropriate example (the one of elevator was short for full understanding) was still missing in Einstein theory to clarify the issue. Here is such one :
Let’s us figure we are having bath in a round swimming pool. This pool being furnished with water jets, all around. To start with we suppose that those jets are locked. Our sensation is the one of floating freely in the water, with zero gravity. And now if we open, together, all the vans of those jets the sensation would remain unchanged, each water jet being neutralized by an opposite one. In physics such situation is called "isotropic".
But what happen if we decide to unlock half part of the water jets ? The conditions are no longer isotropic and our body would be pushed toward the poolside were water jets remains locked. The situation in the pool is now described as "anisotropic".
All of us have experienced to set the hand in opposition with the air when moving with our car. The sensation is the one of a strong jet stream on our palm pushing back our hand. We could, as well, have such experiment with a water jet. But in the first case we were moving in an air medium at rest, when in the second case it’s the water which is moving when our hand is at rest (we may use air or water, or any fluids, to come with same results).
Here is a good example to understand how acceleration and gravity could end with same result.
But to link gravity to such example we have to admit the existence of some kind of medium in which Universe should be bathed (like us in our pool). This was the belief of ancient physicists and they call it "ether". But Einstein got rid of it (ether) and, therefore, was forced to come with a very complicate geometry theory (curving space) to test a better approach for gravity calculation. Refusing the hypothesis set up by quantum physicists of a mysterious and undetected particle, named "graviton", and its giant wave, supposed to be the alternative answer.
But if we consider that Einstein was wrong (and quantum physicists too) we have to suppose that such medium does, really, exist. Then we have a lot more simple solution to gravity understanding, as our previous example show up.
Such medium would just have to be made of energy particles having very tiny mass and poorly affected by electro-magnetic barrier set by baryonic matter. But, time to time, caught by atomics nucleus. Far away from any baryonic matter (stars, planets or black holes) the situation is isotropic, as a result zero gravity. But when coming closer to such corps, the situation should become anisotropic. Why? The particles crossing the heart of matter should face a greater density of nucleus and some of them are caught. Consequently less quantity of particles on their way out must face particles on their way in which means that the energy of pressure is lesser and the situation become anisotropic.
For which we have to come to a first conclusion which is that gravity should not be an attraction force, but a pressure one! And in the condition described above a pressure fall should be generated.
Those pressure falls are well known in air or water mediums. They are called, tornadoes, hurricanes or whirlpool. Their common character is their shape: a conic one. The proof for such cones in space is the ellipse orbit, discovered by Kepler, from which Einstein started his too complicate calculation to try to describe the curving space. But also for anybody just looking at a spiral galaxy picture.
As we now know, such particles does exist. They are called neutrinos and, may be, neutralinos (?). And we know too that 95% of Universe mass is made of black energy (75%) and black matter (20%). But more significant are photons, for which we may state that their density increase when coming closer to the constricted area of the cone (Chéseau-Halley law).
We have, then, to conclude that "ether" is a reality, some kind of fluid working at a particle level cause for all phenomena around us, such as gravity and orbiting.
We came to the same conclusion, few years ago, by another way, more simple and beautiful (see "
Relativity dead end"). Here it is:
We have to be back at the third century BC. A Greek mathematician, named Appollonius from Perga, working on conics found what figure was coming out when a flat was crossing a cone with various angle. Among them the imperfect figure of a circle which he named, for that reason, an "elleipsis".
So when Kepler, 19 centuries later, came to the conclusion that Mars orbit was not a circle but an ellipse, he should have been able to come to the right conclusion of an existing cone. And when Newton linked the orbiting phenomenon to gravity he could have, too, think to an existing hidden cone.
So we had to wait Einstein, two century later, working on the metrical tensor (Riemann geometry) to come closer to the solution and improve the calculation of Mercury orbit. To him the space had to be curved because there was no ether. From this miscalculation he didn’t found the final ellipse secret: gravity. But we fill strongly he was right not believing in quantum theory of "graviton".
As our concern, we fill lucky for this Einstein miscalculation which open the way to the right solution.
Here is ending our third article unveiling a part of the main secret in physics, gravity. But still has to be solved the issue of what "ether" is made of: black energy ? Black matter ? This task belongs to powerful organization such as the CERN.
To us a last issue remains unanswered, to which we could come with some clues, the one of "time". This will be our next and final article in the weeks to come.
05.23.2013
Email : correspondance@editiondelomnibus.com
www.editiondelomnibus.com
